appeals (pl noun)
6.29.21
The issue split the high court on a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joining with the court’s three liberal justices to leave the moratorium in place. The court’s action came in a brief order. As is typical in emergency appeals, the court didn’t explain its reasoning... A Washington federal appeals court also chose to leave the moratorium in place, saying the government had strong arguments that the moratorium was lawful.
—Brent Kendall & Andrew Ackerman, "Supreme Court Declines to Lift National Eviction Moratorium," 29 Jun. 2021 {9:44 PM ET}
The issue split the high court on a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joining with the court’s three liberal justices to leave the moratorium in place. The court’s action came in a brief order. As is typical in emergency appeals, the court didn’t explain its reasoning... A Washington federal appeals court also chose to leave the moratorium in place, saying the government had strong arguments that the moratorium was lawful.
—Brent Kendall & Andrew Ackerman, "Supreme Court Declines to Lift National Eviction Moratorium," 29 Jun. 2021 {9:44 PM ET}
10.19.20
One case involves Trump’s appeal of a June ruling by a federal appeals court in California that his administration’s use of Pentagon funding to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is illegal. A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that Trump’s diversion of defense, military and other funding — billions of dollars that were not originally earmarked for border wall construction — violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive power of the purse.
—John Kruzel, "Supreme Court to review Trump border wall funding, asylum policies," 19 Oct. 2020 {9:41 AM EDT}
One case involves Trump’s appeal of a June ruling by a federal appeals court in California that his administration’s use of Pentagon funding to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is illegal. A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that Trump’s diversion of defense, military and other funding — billions of dollars that were not originally earmarked for border wall construction — violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive power of the purse.
—John Kruzel, "Supreme Court to review Trump border wall funding, asylum policies," 19 Oct. 2020 {9:41 AM EDT}
California federal appeals court *
emergency appeals *
federal appeals court *
Washington federal appeals court *
9th Circuit Court of Appeals *
emergency appeals *
federal appeals court *
Washington federal appeals court *
9th Circuit Court of Appeals *